Friday, February 7, 2025
HomeJOBS AND EDUCATIONSupreme Court upholds Madrassa Act: Says, 'Abolishing it is like throwing away...

Supreme Court upholds Madrassa Act: Says, 'Abolishing it is like throwing away the baby with water'; Kamil-Fazil's degrees are unconstitutional

The Supreme Court has given a big decision for the children studying in Madarsa in Uttar Pradesh. The court has upheld the validity of the Uttar Pradesh Madrasa Act. The Supreme Court has overturned the decision of the Allahabad High Court, which while canceling the Act had said that the Madrasa Act of UP is a violation of secularism.

In the news we will know what the Supreme Court has said in its decision, what is the Madrasa law, why the High Court had declared it unconstitutional and now what will be the change in Madrasa education due to the decision of the Supreme Court…

Supreme Court said 5 big things in the order

Article 21A of the Constitution and the Right to Education Act 2009 provide no hindrance to the right of minorities to open madrassas. Therefore, the Madrasa Act is not unconstitutional. Rejecting the Act is like throwing out the baby with the bath water. The Madrasa Act comes under the legislative competence of the state government under Entry 25 of the Concurrent List. It is ensured that Madrasas provide secular education. The Madrasa Board can make rules with the approval of the state government. Under the Madrasa Act, the higher education degrees of Fazil and Kamil are unconstitutional as they are contrary to the UGC Act.

Madarsa Board awards graduation degree with the name Kamil and post graduation degree with the name Fazil. These degrees have now been declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.

Madrasa Act brought to bring control of government

In the year 2004, Madrasa Education Act was brought to improve the education in Madrasas. Its objective is to control the functioning of madrassas in Uttar Pradesh. Under the Act, a framework was created for opening Madrasas in Uttar Pradesh, giving them recognition and administration of Madrasas.

Under the Act, the Uttar Pradesh Madrasa Education Board was established to oversee and monitor the activities of Madrasas in UP. Some eligibility criteria were fixed to get recognition from the board. The board was responsible for preparing syllabus for madrassas, teaching material and training teachers.

The first petition against the Madrasa Act was filed in 2012 by Sirajul Haq, manager of Darul Uloom Wasiya Madrasa. Then in 2014, the petition was filed by Minority Welfare Secretary Abdul Aziz of Lucknow and in 2019 by Mohammad Javed of Lucknow. After this, in 2020, Raijul Mustafa had filed two petitions. Anshuman Singh Rathore filed the petition in 2023. The National Commission for Child Protection (NCPCR) argued that even though one has the right to take religious education, it cannot be accepted as an alternative to mainstream education. The nature of all these cases was the same. Therefore Allahabad High Court merged all the petitions.

See also  Anticipatory bail to actor Siddiqui in sexual harassment case: Court rebuked the complainant, said- why did you complain after 8 years; Allegations are- Raped in the hotel

In these petitions, the Act was opposed on these 5 points-

The Madrasa Act, which promotes separate education on religious grounds, is against the principle of secularism and fundamental rights. Madrasas fail to ensure quality education up to the age of 14 under Article 21A of the Constitution, which deals with the right to education. Due to exclusion of Madrassas from the Right to Education Act, 2009, children are not able to get quality education. More religious education of Islam is being given in Madrassas than teaching of modern subjects. This Act is contrary to Section 22 of the University Grants Commission. In which there are rules for awarding degree of higher studies.

The issue gained momentum due to UP government's investigation into illegal madrassas.

The UP government had received inputs from social organizations and security agencies that madrassas were being run illegally. On this basis, Uttar Pradesh Council and Minority Minister had decided to conduct a survey. After this, a 5-member team was formed in every district. This included District Minority Officer and District School Inspector.

The survey of madrassas was conducted from 10 September 2022 to 15 November 2022. This time limit was later extended till 30 November. In this survey, about 8441 madrassas were found in the state which were not recognized. In October 2023, the UP government had formed SIT to investigate madrassas. SIT is investigating foreign funding to madrassas. At present there are 25 thousand madrassas in Uttar Pradesh. Of these, about 16,500 madrasas have received recognition from the State Madrasa Education Council. Of these, there are 560 madrassas which get government grants.

High Court declared Madrasa Act unconstitutional

See also  Nora Fatehi continued shooting even after injury: Actress said - got a chance to act in South after seven years, did not care about the pain

On March 22, 2024, the Allahabad High Court, while hearing the petitions, had canceled the Madrasa Education Act, declaring it unconstitutional. The Lucknow bench of the court had said that this act is against secularism, Articles 14, 15 (right to equality) and 21-A (right to education) of the Indian Constitution.

The High Court said that the Madrasa Board has discriminated against the education of children. The High Court said that when children of all religions are getting modern education in every subject, then children of a particular religion should not be limited to madrassa education.

The court had also directed the Uttar Pradesh government to make a plan to transfer children studying in madrassas to recognized schools.

Supreme Court stayed the High Court's decision

Anjum Qadri, manager of Madrasa Azizia Ijazutul Uloom, had challenged the decision of the High Court in the Supreme Court. The first hearing took place in the Supreme Court on April 5, 2024. The court stayed the High Court's decision.

The court had said, 'The High Court is prima facie not right. It would be wrong to say that this Madrassa Act violates secularism. It is not right to give instructions to transfer madrassa students to another school. Religious education has never been a curse in the country. How are Buddhist monks trained?'

See also  Baby Raha calls Alia Bhatt mother, not mom: Video of the actress revealed, fans said - she is such a sweet girl.

The UP government had also defended the Madrasa Act in the High Court. Then the court had said – Secularism means, 'Live and let live.' If the government says that they should also be given some secular education, then it is the sentiment of the country.

A hearing was held in the Supreme Court on 22 October and the court had reserved the decision.

Madrasa Act is constitutional, Supreme Court pointed out 2 mistakes of High Court

'The High Court made a mistake in assuming that education in madrassas violates Article 21 related to the right to education. Because Right to Education does not apply to minority educational institutions. It is also wrong to believe that the right to open a madrassa for imparting religious education is protected under Article 30. Because even though Madrassas impart religious education, they are basically education, hence the Madrassa Act cannot go beyond the legislative competence given to the State Government under the Concurrent List.

Now madrassas will not be able to give degrees even to Kamil and Fazil. According to the court's decision, madrassas can give certificates up to 12th, but madrassas will not have the recognition to provide further education i.e. post graduation and graduation degrees. This means that Madrassas recognized by the Board will no longer be able to give Kamil and Fazil degrees to students.

Student wearing underwear detained in Iran: Was protesting against hijab in university campus; The college declared him mentally ill.

A video from an Iranian university is viral on social media, in which guards are detaining a girl wearing undergarments. It is being said that the girl has taken off her clothes to protest against Iran's strict dress code (compulsory wearing of hijab). Read the full news..

Graphics Source: NavJivanIndia | VaskarAssets

Global News Daily
Global News Dailyhttps://globalnewsdaily.online
At Global News Daily, we are committed to delivering unbiased, accurate, and engaging content that keeps you informed and ahead of the curve. Whether it's politics, business, technology, culture, or sports, our dedicated team of experienced journalists and editors works tirelessly to provide you with the most up-to-date information you need, when you need it. Our mission is to present the facts, spark meaningful conversations, and give our readers a comprehensive understanding of the stories shaping our world.

Similar Articles

Comments

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular